WEB204 » 03) Heuristic Evaluation for Websites Report
Heuristic Evaluation, as described by Nielsen, is a discount Usability Inspection Method for quick, cheap, and easy evaluation of a user interface design. It specifically involves a set of expert evaluators examining a user interface to find Usability Problems within an interface design and judge its compliance with recognized usability principles, known as the “Heuristics.”
Heuristic Evaluation is also a good choice to use as Usability Evaluation Method to use a a pre-cursor to a Usability Testing Study as it is a widely used methodology for finding Usability Problems within an interface design. It also will give you and your team a clearer picture of what potential Usability Problems you might want to test with a set of participants.
Requirements:
- This Heuristic Evaluation for Websites Report shall be written as to describe the motivations for, procedures of and results of conducting a Heuristic Evaluation for Websites.
- Create at least two scenarios to conduct this study and report your findings according to the 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design by the Nielsen Norman Group.
- Each Heuristic Evaluation for Websites Report shall contain but not be limited to: 1) Background & Objectives for the evaluation 2) Procedure & Materials of the evaluation 3) Findings & Results of the evaluation
- Post a link to this assignment in the comments section AND print all of this out and turn in as your Heuristic Evaluation for Websites Report assignment according to the class Schedule (Winter) or Schedule (Spring).
Examples:
- Research Activity Report: Heuristic Evaluation | Mike Sinkula (et al)
- Heuristic Review Example | Thomas & Marina
- Seattle Tilth Heuristic Analysis Report | Cameron Kunz, Jeff Reynolds and Michelle Szwedo
This portion of the Premium Design Works website is written by Mike Sinkula for the Web Design & Development students at Seattle Central College and the Human Centered Design & Engineering students at the University of Washington.
11 Comments:
Our Heuristic Evaluation Report
Group 4 – Liz Stone, Trang Pham, Marco Garcia, Griffin Dotson
PCC Natural Markets
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ALKwHAvjqgFotd1aqhkS3beDyenIC3y1bPrHSiyKHq4/edit
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gAANlwoCLtiEfliPb_u0xsXiQJwb_LKWaL47IRAWke0/edit?usp=sharing
Manitasha Arora, Jeremiah Smith, Ruth Mansoor,
Joseph Wanderer
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11pcHrKvl0DNEAqnDgNG6wKeYgtVNF3djaeeaXnGsfjI/edit?usp=sharing
For the Library… and its team of Misfits http://ultan.photography/itc298/heuristicevaluation.pdf
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vagq-_0Kl0_FpBdA7lqEpBqwFhWu0Sdc8rcI_K_2NvM/edit#heading=h.cdl2itb4c6de
This is for the Venice Biennale group, who is:
Tatiana Zaccara
Kristin DelViscio
Kayla Kang
Dann Frey
Nico Davis
Heuristic Evaluation Report for Calvin Calvo, Rosie Fisher-Sergent, Haben Haftu, Adam Kozie, Naomi Nosek
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j5J9884YV4aYfpa5pr3N-t9nM3nriyervOiUD3eelFA/edit?usp=sharing
Here is the Heuristic Evaluation for Sam, Bri, Shunta, and Seth.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fzXQqvnNV3J4Ziim3wX27JOxxLfh2E3B8wblCS6MZDw/edit#heading=h.kt2ec0uiai3h
Heuristic Evaluation Report for South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Website
(Anna Sabo, Katherine Shaw, Margaret Gomez, Kristopher Chambers):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gryv9khcI3Ql0S4Jz68fjCfoG2J6F9nngl9_I-ZTnIk/edit?usp=sharing
Heuristic Evaluation Report by Starr Harris, Tiffany Wan, Akash Tolangee, and Tosia Klincewicz
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ANYUouPCeS5ePx6brN4gwzOTGA3L0nv-yWrixGC_9c8/edit?usp=sharing
Heuristic Review for Association of Washington Cities.
Boom!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1woP_TBGn6cDNfoQnZ6zY7kDbK65YJiiShP-TUTyIT54/edit?usp=sharing
Heuristic Review for McMenamin’s
http://webjules.com/itc298/images/HeuristicReview.pdf
Trackbacks: